Redbridge, London
Wraparound extension drawings in Redbridge
Redbridge's Housing Design SPD says wraparound extensions need particularly careful consideration, and names the remedy: low eaves and shallow pitched roofs that limit the effect on neighbours. Our wraparound extension drawings for Redbridge houses start at £1,195 including VAT and build the roof section around that sentence, because it is the first thing an officer will check.
From £1,195 (VAT included)
- MCIAT chartered
- £2m PI insured
- LABC Partnered
- Fixed fees, VAT included
Request a fixed quote

How we work on wraparound extension drawings
Nine steps from first call to approval.

Enquiry and constraints check
We check the property against conservation areas, listed status, Article 4 directions, tree preservation orders, flood zone and planning history. We choose the right route and send a fixed quote.
Measured survey
We survey the house on one datum: rooms, levels, boundaries, drains, trees and the neighbours' windows that the 45° and 25° tests depend on.
Design options
We model the house in Revit and show you options in 3D and plan, with the planning strategy and the precedents in your street.
Design frozen
You choose an option in writing. Nothing changes after this without your say.
Independent check
A second chartered technologist checks every sheet against the council's validation checklist and the policy. A senior review signs it off before anything is submitted.
Submission
We prepare the forms, certificates, fee and documents and submit through the Planning Portal.
Officer liaison
We answer the planning officer and make any amendments within five working days, at no charge until approval.
Building regulations
Technical drawings are coordinated with the structural engineer's calculations, the drainage and the planning conditions.
Approval and hand-over
Building control approval, then a next-steps pack covering the commencement notice, party wall timing and CIL.
Free redraws until approval. Every drawing set is checked independently, and the checker is never the person who drew it.
Request a fixed quote
What the Redbridge Housing Design SPD asks for
The Housing Design Guide SPD treats wraparounds as a special case. They need particularly careful consideration, and the document points to two design moves: eaves kept low where the extension meets the boundary, and roofs pitched shallowly so that the mass does not loom over the garden next door. The council gives no length or height figure for this in the guidance we reviewed, so the test is judgement rather than arithmetic.
Judgement is easier to win with a section than with a paragraph. We draw the boundary section through the lowest point of the eaves and the highest point of the ridge with the neighbour's ground level, fence line and nearest window drawn in, so the officer can see what the neighbour will see.
A flat roof with a rooflight is a common alternative and has the lowest profile of all, but it can look out of place beside a pitched original. We draw both and let you choose with the elevations in front of you.
Neighbours matter in a second way. Where the adjoining house already has a rear or side extension, the new wall can line up with it, and a matching depth is far easier to support than one that sticks out beyond it. We photograph and measure the neighbour's existing additions from your side of the fence and put them on the block plan, so the comparison is on the page when the officer opens the file.

Local figures for Redbridge
| Measure | Value | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Households living in a house | 66.2 % of households living in a house or bungalow (detached, semi-detached or terraced) | Census 2021 | nomisweb.co.uk |
| Owner-occupied households | 57.1 % of households owner-occupied (owned outright or with mortgage/loan) | Census 2021 | nomisweb.co.uk |
| Green Belt share of the council area | 34 % of council area covered by green-belt polygons | — | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Conservation areas | 16 named conservation areas published by the council | — | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Listed building entries | 134 list entries (Historic England, within the LPA boundary) | — | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Householder decisions | 991 decisions | 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026 | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Householder applications granted | 82.8 % | 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026 | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Householder applications decided in time | 94.7 % decided within 8 weeks or an agreed extended period | 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026 | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Larger home extension prior approvals granted | 46 decisions | 2025 Q2 to 2026 Q1 (1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2026) | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Larger home extension prior approvals refused | 93 decisions | 2025 Q2 to 2026 Q1 (1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2026) | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Domestic gardens share of land (GLUD 2005) | 27.4 % of land that is domestic garden (GLUD 2005) | 2005 | data.london.gov.uk |
| Householder: alterations/extensions to a single dwellinghouse, from 1 Apr 2026 | 548 GBP | — | ribblevalley.gov.uk |
A blank value means the figure has not been published, not that there are none. Check your own address with the council.
Householder applications by street in Redbridge
| Street | Applications | Approved |
|---|---|---|
| Wensleydale Avenue | 37 | 73% |
| Kings Avenue | 33 | 71% |
| Gyllyngdune Gardens | 32 | 39% |
| Malford Grove | 31 | 71% |
| Wanstead Park Avenue | 29 | 89% |
| Broadwalk | 27 | 91% |
| Falmouth Gardens | 27 | 88% |
| Levett Gardens | 27 | 58% |
| Beehive Lane | 25 | 48% |
| Goodmayes Lane | 24 | 71% |
| High View Road | 24 | 83% |
| Woodlands Avenue | 24 | 86% |
| Beattyville Gardens | 23 | 78% |
| Bressey Grove | 23 | 86% |
| Monkhams Avenue | 23 | 86% |
Single-storey rear extension: the permitted development limits
The house in section with a rear extension; the dashed lines mark the zone near the boundary.
- A · Depth beyond the original rear wall
- 3 m (attached) / 4 m (detached) beyond the original rear wall, single storey
- B · Maximum height
- 4 m
- C · Within the zone near the boundary
- Eaves no higher than 3 m where within 2 m of the curtilage boundary
- D · Larger extension under prior approval
- 6 m (attached) / 8 m (detached), single storey, height max 4 m; not on article 2(3) land or an SSSI
A suburban borough with real Green Belt
66.2 per cent of households here live in a house, and 57.1 per cent own their home. This is a place of semis and terraces with side passages, which is exactly the plot shape a wraparound suits.
Green Belt covers 34 per cent of the borough. That does not touch most suburban streets, but a house backing onto it, or one that sits within it, is judged under stricter policy on extensions, and we confirm the status of the address before drawing.
Redbridge has 16 conservation areas and 134 listed entries, a modest heritage load. Most owners keep national rights, and the first question is whether those rights stretch to the whole wraparound.
Permitted development, prior approval and Redbridge's record
Under national rules the rear part is limited as follows: 3 m (attached) / 4 m (detached) beyond the original rear wall, single storey. The side part is limited as follows: Side extension: single storey, max 4 m high, max half the width of the original house. Either part may fit on its own and the two together may not, because Limits apply to the total enlargement (new part plus any existing enlargement it joins).
For rear depth beyond the basic limit, owners use the larger-home prior approval. In the latest national statistics the council granted 46 and refused 93. Refusals were roughly double the approvals, so the route carries real risk, mainly where an adjoining neighbour objects.
The prior approval does nothing for the side wing. If the design needs both, a householder application covering the whole L is cleaner than splitting the scheme across two routes.
Householder volume and timing in Redbridge
Redbridge decided 991 householder applications in its latest published year, granted 82.8 per cent and decided 94.7 per cent inside eight weeks or an agreed extension.
As ever these are all-project figures. Gardens make up 27.4 per cent of the borough's land, so there is more room to give up than in inner London, but the proposed plan still shows what remains.
Wraparound extension drawings in Redbridge: what you pay and get
The drawing set has existing and proposed plans, sections and elevations with a location plan and a block plan. A second chartered technologist checks the set, and the fee of £1,195 including VAT is fixed in advance. If Redbridge asks for changes before deciding, we redraw at no charge; the council's own fee is £548.
When foundations go deep beside a neighbour's wall, a notice is needed: Adjacent excavation notice at least 1 month before work: within 3 m and deeper than the neighbour's foundations, or within 6 m and cutting a 45° line from their foundations. We mark the relevant distances on the foundation plan. Glazing is capped too: Windows, roof windows, rooflights and doors in an extension should not exceed 25% of the extension floor area plus the area of openings removed or covered. A wraparound with a wall of sliding doors across the back can reach that cap faster than owners expect, so we total the openings before the elevations are finished.
Related drawings and neighbouring councils
A deep rear extension on its own is dealt with in rear extension drawings in Redbridge, and a full-height alternative in double-storey extension drawings in Redbridge. Roof space is covered by loft conversion drawings in Redbridge. The overview page is architectural drawings in Redbridge. Just across the boundary, Waltham Forest and Newham set different limits.
What you receive


Related pages
Other services in Redbridge
Questions
What does Redbridge say about wraparound extensions?
The Housing Design SPD says they need particularly careful consideration, with low eaves and shallow pitched roofs to limit the effect on neighbours. We build the boundary section around that.
Is Green Belt a problem for a wraparound in Redbridge?
Only for the addresses it covers. Green Belt covers 34 per cent of the borough, and extensions there face stricter policy, so we check the site before quoting a design.
What do wraparound extension drawings cost in Redbridge?
From £1,195 including VAT, fixed in advance. The council's fee is separate.
Sources and dates
- nomisweb.co.uk, retrieved
- nomisweb.co.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- assets.publishing.service.gov.uk, retrieved
- assets.publishing.service.gov.uk, retrieved
- data.london.gov.uk, retrieved
- ribblevalley.gov.uk, retrieved
- redbridge.gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
- gov.uk, retrieved
- Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
- Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Contains Historic England data © Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Tell us about your property.
We check the constraints, then send a fixed fee. Messages before 3pm get a reply the same working day.